Plain-language answer
Will a consequential company claim survive audience-specific scrutiny?
Narrative Integrity compares each claim with support, disconfirming facts, verification, risk, and ownership across board, investor, and acquirer modes.
Short answer
Use evidence that can survive a second reader.
- Support without a recorded contradiction produces Supported.
- Support plus a disconfirming fact or diligence gap produces Contested.
- A claim without support produces Unsupported.
- Audience mode changes the required evidence, not the provenance contract.
Worked example
See the decision in a fictional case.
- Claim
- Enterprise expansion is repeatable
- Market Reality
- Three wins share the same trigger and buyer
- Supporting Evidence
- Pipeline contains 12 matching accounts
- Disconfirming Evidence
- Implementation time rose 20%
- Risk
- Capacity may constrain conversion
- Disclosure
- partial
Use Narrative IntegrityInspect the full methodTake it into the matching Petrichor work
What this answer cannot establish
- The method is not board, investment, valuation, transaction, accounting, disclosure, tax, or legal advice.